[Adium-devl] 1.4a1 planning
zacwest at gmail.com
Fri Apr 10 18:56:11 UTC 2009
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 14:34, David Smith <catfish.man at gmail.com> wrote:
> After Evan's commits this morning adding listobject proxies (hooray),
> the issue list is getting pretty small. I'm curious what people think must
> be fixed before we can do an alpha. Personally I think
> http://trac.adiumx.com/ticket/11888 is the most important.
> Next up (but we
> have to figure out how to reproduce them) are probably
> http://trac.adiumx.com/ticket/11828 and http://trac.adiumx.com/ticket/11813.
> I'm inclined to *not* block a1 on those.
Disagree; these are bad regressions. A random crasher and a totally
bad contact-hiding regression are not something we should alpha-push
with. I think these should be fixed for an alpha along with the above.
>Similarly, the UI part of
> http://trac.adiumx.com/ticket/500 needs doing, but I think we can get away
> with leaving it out for a1.
Info inspector and contact list handling need to manage it, but other
than that it shouldn't be too bad. Shift+drag to copy into a group,
something else in info inspector.
> Nothing else on
> http://trac.adiumx.com/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&milestone=Adium+1.4 seems
> Thoughts? Am I pushing the definition of "alpha" too far by
> suggesting leaving those three out?
> Adium-devl mailing list
> Adium-devl at adiumx.com
More information about the Adium-devl