msn-pecan 0.1 good enough?
Evan Schoenberg, M.D.
evan at adium.im
Wed Mar 24 00:56:24 UTC 2010
On Mar 23, 2010, at 7:53 PM, Jordan wrote:
> At the currently slow rate we're proceeding with 1.4 and with
> confirmation from Evan and/or Zac and Eric, it seems possible that
> pecan could be tested out in 1.4 trunk (and if it goes well, in a
> beta) sometime soon; but likely only if this last regression were to
Especially because of the slow rate, we shouldn't make a major change like this for 1.4. We need to finish up the few remaining minor problems and get 1.4 out the door.
There's no reason this couldn't be considered for the next immediate release after 1.4, but even with a promise of "there are no regressions" I guarantee something would come up with a change of this scope.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel